Conor Brady vs Phoenix Weir Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Aug at 03:50 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Brady vs P. Weir

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Brady 1 - 0 Weir
They have played 3 sets in total, with Conor Brady winning 2 and Phoenix Weir winning 1. The last match between Conor Brady and Phoenix Weir was at the M25 Roehampton, 03-08-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Conor Brady getting the victory 6-1 4-6 10-7.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brady | 1 |
| Weir | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M25 Roehampton(08-03-25)
C. Brady vs P. Weir H2H Profile
C. Brady vs P. Weir Match Preview:
- Second serve proficiency shows Brady has the upper hand, scoring 44.57% of points against Weir, who has achieved 35.61%.
- Who dominates returning games? Brady stands out, having captured 52.27% of opponents' second serve points, while Weir trails with 45.67%.
- On first serve returns, Brady excels with 33.52% compared to Weir’s 26.26%, indicating a potential advantage in returning serves.
- Under pressure, who manages breakpoints better? Weir shines in breakpoint defense, saving 57.78% compared to Brady’s 50%.
- Analyzing past performances, Weir has a stronger win-loss record, victorious in 46.67% of matches in contrast to Brady's 28.57% win rate.
- Weir's most successful surface is indoor hard courts with a 61% win rate, whereas Brady shows a 40% success on hard courts.
- In the context of player level, Weir performs better in lower-tier events, winning 50% of $10K tournament matches as opposed to Brady's 28.57%.
- Assessing opponent strength, Brady faces slightly tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 329.71 compared to Weir's 362.87.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Weir is favored, having won 40% of deciding sets, while Brady hasn’t won any.
- Breakpoint conversion rates suggest Weir is more capable, converting 38.89% of opportunities while Brady has managed only 25.93%.
Editorial Prediction (August 3, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing recent statistics and performance patterns, the indicators point towards Weir having several key advantages over Brady. While Brady exhibits strength in second serve performance and return games, Weir counters this with superior breakpoint-saving capabilities and a more impressive record in deciding sets.
Weir's proficiency in saving breakpoints suggests a stronger mental resilience under pressure, which could be a crucial factor in tightly contested situations. Additionally, Weir's higher win rate across matches and surfaces augments their edge.
Considering the combination of Weir's historical performance, breakpoint efficiency, and surface proficiency, Weir emerges as the likely candidate to secure victory in this upcoming match.
Conor Brady vs Phoenix Weir Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Brady vs P. Weir H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 20 | Games Won | 14 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:24:57 | Average Match Time | 1:24:57 |
| 71% (37/52) | 1st Serve % | 49% (29/59) |
| 49% (18/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (18/29) |
| 87% (13/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (13/30) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 47% (28/59) | Return Points Win % | 40% (21/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Brady Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | w/o | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
P. Weir Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-7(2) 10-7 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 4-6 10-7 | ||

C. Brady vs P. Weir Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40.00% (6/9) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.19% (40/43) |
| 41.18% (14/20) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.20% (92/95) |
| 46.08% (153/179) | Games Win/Loss | 50.05% (917/915) |
| 50.00% (5/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 35.00% (14/26) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.41% (26/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 9 | Aces Total | 349 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 29 | Total Double Faults | 207 |
| 1:39:20 | Average Match Time | 1:14:36 |
| 191.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 309.51 |
| 70% (601/861) | 1st Serve % | 62% (2839/4607) |
| 56% (339/601) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1975/2839) |
| 48% (125/260) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (878/1768) |
| 40% (39/97) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (182/402) |
| 42% (359/865) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1727/4451) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 40.00% (6/9) | Futures W/L | 48.78% (40/42) |
| 40% (6/15) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (40/83) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (8/18) |
| 50% (2/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 100% (6/6) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (43/38) |
| 0% (6/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (43/5) |
| 0% (9/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (40/2) |